CHILDREN, SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES

14-19 Diplomas

Edward Balls: The first five new diplomas will be available from September 2008 and will be in construction and the built environment, creative and media, engineering, information technology, and society, health and development. We announced last March that over 800 schools and over 150 colleges would be in the first consortia offering 14-19 Diplomas from September 2008.
	A breakdown of consortia offering the first five lines by region and local authority is shown in table 1. The forecast first year diploma funding for each region in 2008-09 is set out in table 2, subject to final pupil numbers for each region.
	The next five diplomas will be available from September 2009 and will be in manufacturing and product design, business, administration and finance, land-based and environmental studies, hair and beauty, and hospitality. We can now announce that two thirds of all secondary schools and three quarters of colleges in England have applied to offer these five new diplomas, plus the first five diplomas, as part of consortia from September 2009.
	These figures show that diplomas are proving a popular choice for schools and colleges. Diplomas will offer learners a new route into further and higher education as well as into skilled work. In December, the independent organisation UCAS announced that the points value of the advanced diploma will be the same as that awarded for three and a half A levels.
	
		
			 Consortia Readines Assessment (January 2008) 
			 Go Local Authority No. of Consortia in LA No. of Schools in Consortium No. of Colleges in Consortium in LA 
			 EE Cambridgeshire 1 7 2 
			 EE Hertfordshire 3 28 3 
			 EE Luton 1 6 1 
			 EE Norfolk 2 9 1 
			 EE Southend-on-Sea 1 5 1 
			 EE Suffolk 1 4 1 
			 EM Derby 1 2 1 
			 EM Nottingham 1 11 4 
			 EM Derbyshire 1 4 0 
			 EM Leicestershire 2 10 2 
			 EM Lincolnshire 6 25 5 
			 EM Northamptonshire 3 9 3 
			 EM Nottinghamshire 4 30 5 
			 EM Rutland 1 2 2 
			 L Barking and Dagenham 1 8 1 
			 L Bromley 1 5 1 
			 L Croydon 1 4 2 
			 L Ealing 1 17 2 
			 L Hackney 3 6 5 
			 L Hammersmith and Fulham 1 3 0 
			 L Haringey 1 3 0 
			 L Harrow 1 4 1 
			 L Hillingdon 1 8 1 
			 L Hounslow 1 3 0 
			 L Islington 1 8 1 
			 L Lambeth 1 7 2 
			 L Lewisham 1 6 2 
			 L Newham 1 15 2 
			 L Southwark 1 6 2 
			 L Tower Hamlets 1 6 1 
			 L Waltham Forest 1 18 3 
			 L Wandsworth 1 3 1 
			 NE Durham 1 1 1 
			 NE Gateshead 1 1 1 
			 NE Hartlepool 1 2 1 
			 NE Middlesbrough 1 4 1 
			 NE Newcastle-Upon -Tyne 1 6 1 
			 NE North Tyneside 1 11 1 
			 NE Sunderland 1 18 1 
			 NW Blackburn with Darwen 1 1 1 
			 NW Bolton 1 11 2 
			 NW Bury 1 7 1 
			 NW Cheshire 3 16 2 
			 NW Cumbria 1 9 2 
			 NW Halton 1 6 1 
			 NW Knowsley 1 7 1 
			 NW Lancashire 4 21 5 
			 NW Liverpool 1 8 1 
			 NW Manchester 1 11 2 
			 NW Oldham 1 5 1 
			 NW Rochdale 1 3 1 
			 NW Salford 1 10 3 
			 NW Sefton 1 3 1 
			 NW St. Helens 1 3 2 
			 NW Tameside 1 5 1 
			 NW Trafford 1 3 0 
			 NW Warrington 1 4 2 
			 SE Brighton and Hove 1 10 2 
			 SE Buckinghamshire 2 2 1 
			 SE East Sussex 5 5 1 
			 SE Hampshire 3 24 4 
			 SE Kent 4 13 3 
			 SE Medway 1 11 2 
			 SE Milton Keynes 1 3 1 
			 SE Oxfordshire 2 6 1 
			 SE Reading 1 6 0 
			 SE Surrey 5 19 5 
			 SE West Sussex 2 3 2 
			 SW Plymouth 1 9 1 
			 SW Cornwall 1 8 2 
			 SW Dorset 3 13 5 
			 SW Gloucestershire 1 2 1 
			 SW North Somerset 1 14 1 
			 SW Somerset 1 4 1 
			 SW South Gloucestershire 1 6 1 
			 SW Swindon 1 8 1 
			 SW Torbay 1 2 1 
			 SW Wiltshire 1 3 1 
			 WM Birmingham 4 21 6 
			 WM Coventry 2 6 1 
			 WM Dudley 1 3 1 
			 WM Shropshire 1 2 1 
			 WM Solihull 1 6 2 
			 WM Staffordshire 3 10 1 
			 WM Stoke-on-Trent 1 7 1 
			 WM Walsall 1 2 1 
			 WM Wolverhampton 1 13 1 
			 WM Worcestershire 2 16 1 
			 Y&H Barnsley 1 8 2 
			 Y&H Bradford 1 7 1 
			 Y&H Calderdale 1 10 1 
			 Y&H Kingston-upon-Hull 1 15 3 
			 Y&H York 1 6 1 
			 Y&H Kirklees 1 27 4 
			 Y&H Leeds 2 15 2 
			 Y&H North East Lincolnshire 1 2 0 
			 Y&H North Yorkshire 1 4 0 
			 Y&H Rotherham 1 6 1 
			 Y&H Sheffield 1 17 2 
			 Y&H Wakefield 1 1 0 
		
	
	
		
			 Consortia Readines Assessment (January 2008) 
			 Local Authority No of Consortia in Government Office Region No of Schools in Consortium in Government Office Region No of Colleges in Consortium in Government Office Region Key Stage 4 funding for Diplomas in Government Office Region 
			 East of England 9 59 9 £2.3m 
			 East Midlands 19 93 22 £2.6m 
			 London 20 130 27 £5.2m 
			 North-East 7 43 7 £1.4m 
			 North -West 23 133 29 £4.3m 
			 South-East 27 102 22 £3.5m 
			 South-West 12 61 13 £3.3m 
			 West Midlands 17 86 16 £2. 1m 
			 Yorkshire and The Humber 13 118 17 £1.8m 
			 NB. Figures shown above are based upon early estimates of student take up of Diplomas. When take up numbers have been confirmed the funding may change accordingly.

COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Commission on Integration and Cohesion

Hazel Blears: Today I am publishing the Government's response to the "Commission on Integration and Cohesion". Copies of the response have been placed in the Libraries of both Houses.
	In August 2006 the Government asked Darra Singh, the chief executive of Ealing council, to chair a commission examining the issues of integration and cohesion—how, in the light of concerns about communities living "parallel lives", of changing patterns of migration, and of new technologies transforming the way people interact with each other, Government can help build strong communities where neighbours feel at ease, share a sense of belonging, and have the opportunity to work together to shape the future of the place where they live.
	In June 2007, the Commission delivered a serious and ambitious report based on in depth consultation. It set out practical proposals for building cohesion and integration at a local level and contained a number of specific recommendations for Government.
	The report has already influenced a range of policies, changing the debate about how best to bring people of different backgrounds together and empower them to influence the decisions which affect their lives.
	Today, I am pleased to set out in detail my response to all 57 of the Commission's recommendations—what we have already done, what we will do in the future and how we will further develop the Commission's ideas.
	It sets out a new clarity on, and commitment to, delivering cohesive and integrated communities, backed by increased investment in cohesion of some £50 million over the next three years, and a new public service agreement to drive practical action across Government.
	At the heart of the Government's approach, like the Commission's, is the principle that cohesion can only be understood and built locally. Central Government's role is to set the national framework within which local authorities and their partners can deliver improvements to cohesion.
	Our response sets out how we will support this local delivery through six key principles:
	1) a move away from a "one size fits all" approach;
	2) mainstreaming of cohesion into wider policy areas;
	3) a national framework for local support and guidance; including establishing specialist cohesion teams to provide support to local authorities facing cohesion challenges and giving local authorities a tool to assess the impact their planned activities will have on cohesion;
	4) integration of new migrants and existing communities; starting with new guidance for local authorities on developing information packs for migrants;
	5) building positive relationships; to this end we are today also publishing a consultation on "Guidance for Funders", which encourages local authorities to consider how funding can be better used to support greater interaction and;
	6) sharing lessons about what works;
	I am grateful to Darra Singh and his Commissioners for their hard work. With this response the Government are demonstrating their commitment to maintaining the momentum the report has created and helping build stronger communities where all individuals, no matter what their background, feel a sense of shared belonging, and can work with their neighbours to shape a better future for the place where they live.

Local Government

John Healey: On 7 January 2008, the Department published a statement on its website about the local authority business growth incentives scheme:
	www.local.communities.gov.uk/Finance/labgi/statemtyr3pay.pdf
	This indicated that, following further consideration of the new legal challenges that have been made against the current LABGI scheme and the inherent uncertainty this causes to the remaining LABGI pot, the Government intended to reconsider all aspects of the approach used to distribute resources available for Year 3 of the LABGI scheme.
	Alongside our reconsideration of the Year 3 scheme, the Government have reconsidered the payments for Years 1 and 2 of LABGI, which were made on the basis of a number of Valuation Office Agency rateable value "change codes". We have taken the view that there are a number of Valuation Office Agency change codes that have not previously been used in LABGI calculations, which could contain elements of business growth. In light of this, and to avoid the additional delay and uncertainty caused by further legal challenge, the Government proposes to reward authorities on the basis of a wider set of codes than has so far been the case for Years 1 and 2. I will set out the details shortly.
	The Government is still finalising its analysis of options for allocating the resources available for Year 3 of the scheme. We continue to be convinced of the value of providing incentives to encourage business growth, a view echoed by the great majority of the responses to our recent issues paper on the reform of the LABGI scheme, "Building Better Incentives for Local Economic Growth: Reforms to the Local Authority Business Growth Incentives Scheme". We also remain determined to try to achieve this policy aim for LABGI. However, the inclination of a small number of authorities to pursue legal action has created greater complexity, uncertainty and delay. Given this, it will be necessary to retain a portion of the Year 3 funding as a contingency in this final year of the current scheme. I will make an announcement on Year 3 methodology and the size of the contingency retained as soon as possible.

Supporting People

Caroline Flint: The Government are today confirming final programme grant allocations to administering authorities for the Supporting People programme in 2008-09. The programme funds housing-related support services for over 1 million vulnerable people—including victims of domestic violence, teenage parents, older people and those with mental health problems—enabling them to live independently in their accommodation. The Government have invested £8.7 billion since the Supporting People programme began in 2003 and announced a further £4.9 billion of funding for the next three years. Final allocations for 2009-10 and 2010-11 will be confirmed by a further statement to the House closer to the beginning of those financial years. In line with the Government's policy on three-year settlements, it is not intended that the 2009-10 and 2010-11 indicative allocations will be changed from those published on 6 December, other than in exceptional circumstances.
	The refreshed consultation on the Supporting People distribution formula closed in January 2008. Following consideration of the responses, we are today confirming final allocations for 2008-09 and publishing our response to that consultation on the Department's website.
	This three-year settlement, alongside a radically slimmed-down performance framework, will provide authorities with stability for the future and greater flexibility to budget and plan realistic delivery of housing support services.
	A table of Supporting People final programme grant allocations for 2008-09 and a copy of the consultation response have today been placed in the Library of the House. The consultation response will be available on Communities and Local Government's website at:
	www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing/distributionformularesponses.

DEFENCE

Operation Telic/Operation Herrick/Revised Seriously Injured Casualty Data

Des Browne: Following a review of published operational casualty data to align current and historical methods of statistical recording, the number of casualties categorised as seriously injured (SI) (excluding natural cause) on Operation Herrick for 2006 has increased by one from 12 to 13. The number of Operation Telic casualties categorised as SI (excluding natural cause) for 2006 has increased by two from 19 to 21. There have been no changes to the number of very seriously injured (VSI) casualties in either operation. These changes bring the total number of SI casualties (excluding natural cause) for Operation Herrick to 57 and Operation Telic to 144 up to 31 December 2007.
	The statistics on casualty severity which are published on the MOD internet site exclude those individuals whose condition was recorded as due to a natural cause. In a very small number of cases, however, it is not possible to confirm whether individuals are suffering from injury or disease. When casualty reporting on the MOD internet site was first established in early 2006, cases where there was uncertainty over the cause were excluded from the published statistics. However, during an exercise last year to validate and publish retrospective data for the period 2001 to 2005 for the first time, it was decided that such cases, where there is uncertainty over the cause, should be included. This ensures that all those who have suffered an injury are reported. To ensure consistency of the statistical approach, we have now added such cases into the published statistics for January 2006 onwards.
	These revised statistics supercede information previously released by the Department into the public domain.
	The revised data have now been published on the MOD website at:
	http://www.mod.uk.DefenceInternet/FactSheets/Operations Factsheets/OperationsInIraqBritishCasualties.htm
	and
	http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FactSheets/OperationsFactsheets/OperationInAfghanistanBritishCasualties.htm.

ENVIRONMENT FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS

Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management (Budget Allocations and Outcome Targets)

Hilary Benn: On 2 July 2007 I announced that Government spending on flood and coastal erosion risk management in England would increase to £800 million in 2010-11 and that I would publish details later. This past year has shown the impact that flooding can have on communities and individuals, and these record sums for managing the risk of flooding and coastal erosion are clearly needed.
	We will be investing £1.8 billion directly with operating authorities in the next three years on flood management, including new or improved defences, monitoring, and the availability of flood warning. We are also making an initial provision of £34.5 million which may be needed to implement Sir Michael Pitt's recommendations.
	We estimate that local authorities will spend around £260 million maintaining their own defences, as well as funding additional work by the Environment Agency and Internal Drainage Boards. This means that Government will be investing over £2.15 billion during the three year period.
	
		
			Allocated to Operating Authorities Total 
			  £ millions 
			  LA Own Spend (Estimated) Retained (for now) in DEFRA EA Resource (maintenance & operational costs) Capital Programme (new & improved defences & projects)  
			 2007-08 Baseline 86 0 247 259 602 
			 2008-09 87 4 251 308 650 
			 2009-10 87 20.5 258 334.5 700 
			 2010-11 87 38 279 400 804 
			 CSR 3 Year total 261 62.5 788 1,042.5 2,154 
		
	
	I am also setting new targets for the delivery of the capital programme that will include improving the protection of 145,000 households over the three-year period including 45,000 of those most at risk. Targets have also been set that will see the condition of some 24,000 hectares of our SSSIs brought back into favourable condition by 2010.
	
		
			 Outcome Measure Definition Minimum Target 
			 OM1 Economic Benefits Average benefit cost ratio across the capital programme based upon the present value whole life costs and benefits of projects delivering in the CSR07. 5 to 1 average with all projects having a benefit cost ratio robustly greater than 1 
			 OM2 Households protected Number of households with improved standard of protection against flooding or coastal erosion risk. 145,000 households of which 45,000 are at significant or greater probability 
			 OM3 Deprived households at risk Number of households for which the probability of flooding is reduced from significant or greater through projects benefiting the most deprived 20% of areas. 9,000 of the 45,000 households above 
			 OM4 Nationally important wildlife sites Hectares of SSSI land where there is a programme of measures in place (agreed with Natural England) to reach target condition by 2011. 24,000 hectares 
			 OM5 UK Biodiversity Action Plan habitats Hectares of priority Biodiversity Action Plan habitat including intertidal created by March 2011. 800 hectares of which at least 300 hectares should be intertidal

FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS

General Affairs and External Relations Council - 28 January 2008

Jim Murphy: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Kim Darroch (UK permanent representative to the EU) represented the UK at the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) in Brussels.
	The agenda items covered were as follows:
	External Relations
	Pakistan
	The Council discussed the situation in Pakistan ahead of elections on 18 February. Foreign Ministers underlined the importance of maintaining pressure on the Government of Pakistan to ensure free and fair elections, including through the deployment of an EU election observation mission to Pakistan. My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary intervened to encourage further thought within the EU on what it could do to support Pakistan after the elections, including in the areas of institution building and economic development.
	Middle East
	The Council discussed the grave humanitarian situation in Gaza and events on the Egyptian border. Foreign Ministers emphasised the EU's commitment to helping Israel, the Palestinian Authority and Egypt find a solution to the current situation. The Council highlighted the EU's readiness to contribute to a peaceful solution, including through the resumption of the EU's border monitoring mission at Rafah.
	The Council adopted conclusions encouraging the parties to honour their road map commitments, particularly on Israeli settlements and on Palestinian security, and welcoming the achievements of the Paris donors' conference.
	The Council adopted conclusions on Lebanon condemning the recent terrorist attacks in Beirut and welcoming mediation efforts by the Arab League in resolving the political crisis.
	Kenya
	The Council discussed the latest situation in Kenya following recent presidential elections. My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary intervened to underline the seriousness of developments in Kenya and urge continued EU support for the African Union and Kofi Annan in their efforts to help Kenya's political leaders reach agreement on resolving the crisis.
	The Council adopted conclusions condemning the violence, expressing concern about the seriousness of the humanitarian situation in Kenya and urging all parties to engage constructively in dialogue to find a sustainable political solution to the crisis.
	Sudan/Darfur, Chad and the Central African Republic (CAR)
	UN envoy to the Darfur political process Jan Eliasson briefed the Council on the humanitarian and political situation in Darfur. He underlined that it was important the international community urged all parties to cease hostilities and engage in the peace process. In discussion, Foreign Ministers highlighted the need for continued EU pressure on the Government of Sudan to co-operate fully with the prompt deployment of an effective African Union-UN peacekeeping force to Darfur and to implement the comprehensive peace agreement as the basis for peace and development in Sudan.
	The Council adopted conclusions on Sudan welcoming the return of the parties to the comprehensive peace agreement to the Government of national unity. The Council also highlighted the importance of humanitarian access to the people of Darfur, urging all parties in the conflict to cease hostilities, and to engage constructively with the peace process mediated by the UN and African Union envoys.
	The Council also underlined its concern at the deterioration of the security situation in neighbouring Chad and agreed to launch an EU military operation in Chad and the CAR, which will contribute towards an improved security situation in those countries by protecting displaced persons and facilitating the delivery of humanitarian aid.
	Iran
	The High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy Javier Solana briefed the Council on his recent contact with the Iranian authorities and on the decision by the E3+3 (Germany, France, UK, China, Russia and the US) to start consultations in New York on a further sanctions resolution given the lack of Iranian co-operation. The Government support discussion of a further resolution in New York, given the lack of progress and strengthening of the EU's measures in support of action by the UN Security Council.
	Western Balkans
	Discussion of the Western Balkans focused on Serbia. Foreign Ministers agreed to invite Serbia to sign a political agreement on co-operation with the EU and establish a taskforce to assist Serbia to meet the conditions which would enable it to make accelerated progress towards a stabilisation and association agreement. The Government support this political agreement, believing it sends a positive signal of the EU's commitment to Serbia's European future.

LEADER OF THE HOUSE

Scrutiny of European Business

Helen Goodman: During the debate in the House on 25 October 2007 on the motion to renew the present method of appointment of European Standing Committees, the Government undertook to come back to the House with proposals for reform of European scrutiny within three months of the start of the current session. The Government have now tabled a motion proposing changes to the Standing Orders, with a number of related proposals. These reflect consultations across the House in recent months and also take into account the second report of the Select Committee on the Modernisation of the House of 2004-05 Scrutiny of European Business (HC paper 465, session 2004-05). Discussions have been held in particular with: the shadow Leader of the House; the hon. Member for North Southwark and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes); the Chairmen of the European Scrutiny, Liaison and Procedure Committees; the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee; the Chairman of Ways and Means; and the Chairman of the European Union Committee in the House of Lords as well as a number of hon. and right hon. Back-Bench Members of the House, and Members of the European Parliament.
	The present scrutiny system is based on the work of the European Scrutiny Committee in referring selected documents for debate by European Standing Committees, in the context of the House's scrutiny reserve resolution. This delivers real benefits to the House. In particular it ensures that all documents are considered and the major ones are debated. However, improvements are needed to make those debates more constructive and to ensure that Members are able to focus their work in areas where they have an interest and expertise to offer.
	The Government's proposals accordingly build on the present system but seek to make the operation of the European Standing Committees —to be renamed European Committees—more effective. The Government proposes improvements:
	to the way the members of European Standing Committees are selected, with the membership in future drawing in part, where possible, on the European Scrutiny Committee and on relevant departmental select committees
	to the proceedings in European Standing Committees, with opportunities for a brief opening statement from a member of the European Scrutiny Committee and for a more effective style of questioning of Ministers following their initial statements.
	In addition, the Government proposes:
	the alerting of the Scrutiny Committee by the Government at an early stage to consultation exercises on important EU proposals; and
	improved opportunities for Members to receive directly EU documents in areas in which they have expressed a particular interest.
	The Government are also grateful to Mr Speaker for authorising the inclusion in the 'Future Business' section of the daily Order Paper of a list of forthcoming documents and motions for debate in European Committees following referral from the European Scrutiny Committee.
	Taken together, the Government considers that the measures should be a positive step forward in helping Members to engage more effectively in scrutinising those proposals originating in the European Union which are significant and which it is important for this House to examine carefully.

HOME DEPARTMENT

Independent Police Complaints Commission: Oversight of Border and Immigration Agency

Liam Byrne: The Government are soon to introduce a single border force to deliver stronger policing of ports and airports. Along with these changes we will be equipping agency staff with a wide array of police powers, such as those set out in the UK Borders Act. These powers include powers of detention at ports, powers to arrest a person who has committed or is about to commit an offence of assaulting an immigration officer, and powers to enter and search premises for evidence of an arrested individual's nationality.
	Before these powers are introduced it is important that effective oversight arrangements are in place. On the 26 July 2007 therefore, I announced the publication of a consultation document on matters related to the implementation of measures in the Police and Justice Act 2006 to extend the Independent Police Complaints Commission's jurisdiction to cover the Border and Immigration Agency's enforcement functions. I wish to inform the House that I am publishing today an analysis of responses, a Government policy statement setting out the Government's consideration of issues raised by respondents and regulations, subject to negative resolution, which will extend the Independent Police Complaints Commission's jurisdiction in this regard.
	Copies of these regulations and documents have been placed in the House Library.
	The IPCC will provide independent oversight of the most serious complaints, incidents and misconduct matters where police powers are used by immigration officers and officials. This oversight will be similar to that which the IPCC provides for the police and other law enforcement bodies such as Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs and the Serious Organised Crime Agency.
	The new chief inspector created by the UK Borders Act 2007 will monitor the efficiency and effectiveness of the agency's processes and practices as a whole. The IPCC will look at individual cases. The chief inspector will work closely with the IPCC to ensure comprehensive independent external scrutiny of our activities.
	The IPCC already oversees the work of HM Revenue and Customs colleagues; a number of whom will be joining the UK Border Agency.
	I welcome this new oversight and would like to inform the House that similar oversight provisions are currently being developed for Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Justice and Home Affairs Informal Council 25 and 26 January 2008

Meg Hillier: The Justice and Home Affairs Informal Council was held on 25 and 26 January 2008 in Ljubljana. My right hon. and noble Friend the Attorney-General, the Under-Secretary of State for Justice, my hon. Friend the Member for Liverpool, Garston (Maria Eagle) and I attended on behalf of the United Kingdom. Since it was an informal Council, no formal decisions were taken. The following main issues were discussed:
	The first Home Affairs session opened with a report from the presidency on the work of the Future Group on EU Home Affairs. Those not on the group were invited to give their views. All supported the work underway, stressing the need to prioritise data-sharing, both within the EU and co-operation with third countries. In relation to other subject areas, there were suggestions that work might look at the further harmonisation of rules to manage the Schengen area, tighter border controls, measures to bring terrorists to justice and the strengthening of action in the area of civil protection and disaster response. Several delegations also raised the need to ensure that the work of the home affairs group and that of the justice future group were linked more closely. The new European Parliament's civil liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) President, Gérard Deprez, gave a general introduction to the approach of LIBE, stressing their concern for privacy and individual rights.
	The presidency concluded that interoperability of databases and the needs of law enforcement should drive future EU policy on data-sharing, coupled with thorough data protection. On migration, an integrated approach to management was needed based on Frontex (the EU's border agency), operating across land and sea borders. Links with external policy should be stronger, as should data-sharing, and work with and in third countries. In all these areas the EU should analyse what it already had, and then look at the next steps. The presidency noted that a final report should be prepared under the incoming French presidency, with a view to contributing to the successor to the Hague JHA work programme.
	The second session discussed practical co-operation in the field of asylum, with the presidency stressing the need for joint practical projects and asking for views on a European Support Office (ESO) which would oversee all forms of co-operation between member states on the Common European Asylum System. The UK welcomed practical co-operation based on an assessment of why people moved. The Commission said that its proposals on the second stage of the Common European Asylum System were due in July and work on an ESO should start with a feasibility study. All member states agreed that practical cooperation should be strengthened, and that there was a need for more uniform country of origin information. All member states also supported the ESO, but views differed as to its role and staffing. The presidency concluded that work to unify the interpretation of existing instruments, common training, and shared interpretation pool should continue. There was wide support for an ESO, but further work was needed on its tasks and financing. The presidency looked forward to the Commission's ESO study. The Council would be invited to agree conclusions on this at a future session.
	The home affairs session closed the official programme with a working lunch, during which Ministers considered the timetable for the implementation of the second generation of the Schengen information system (SIS II). The Commission and presidency argued that member states had to set and commit to a real timetable for SIS II. More time for testing was needed, but a formal decision had to be taken at the February JHA Council. Ministers agreed with a presidency proposal to remodel the oversight of the SIS II project on similar grounds to that used for SISOne4all, setting up a ministerial level steering group of various member states.

JUSTICE

Civil Justice Council Review

Bridget Prentice: I am today announcing an independent review of the Civil Justice Council in line with Cabinet Office "Guidance for Public Bodies". The Civil Justice Council was established in 1998 and has never been reviewed formally. The review is a timely opportunity to illustrate publicly the considerable achievements of the Council and to help it develop further. The review will be conducted by Dr. Jonathan Spencer CB and will seek the views of the members, those who work with the Council and the end users of the Civil Justice System.
	The review will examine in particular:
	the Council's strengths and weaknesses, the extent to which it has established itself as an authoritative influence in the civil justice world, the extent to which it has chosen important issues to address; and its success in doing so;
	the effectiveness of its chosen ways of working, including the Council itself, its committees and the secretariat, and including the way in which it works and communicates with other organisations; and
	the ways in which the Council and its work should be adjusted, if at all, to maximise its effectiveness in the future.
	The review is due to be complete in spring 2008.

PRIME MINISTER

Government Skills

Gordon Brown: With effect from 1 April 2008, responsibility for Government Skills will be transferred from the Cabinet Office to the Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills.
	Government Skills is the Sector Skills Council tasked with working with central Government Departments and the armed forces to increase the skills of the workforce. With the creation of the Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills this move will improve alignment with economy-wide skills policy.
	Government Skills will continue to work closely with the devolved Administrations and with the Cabinet Office. No transfer of functions order is necessary to effect the change.
	I have today placed in the Libraries of both Houses a paper by the Cabinet Office which sets out the reasons for this change in further detail.